Givenchy Mens Spring 2013 Review
Givenchy Men's Fall 2012 Review
The men's shows have come to an end and pre-fall collections are STILL trickling in and couture week is just around the corner. I don't normally review men's shows because I don't keep as close an eye on them as I do the women's shows. This probably explains why I dress so awfully.
The main take away from the men's shows would have to be the suit which I find odd because so few men wear suits seriously or in a way that designers would like them to. Everybody blew their load over Prada's take on power dressing and Givenchy's steady evolution of dark aggressive sexuality. What interests me most about Givenchy is that Riccardo Tisci has founded a look that is all his own and people want to buy it which I think is extraordinary for a luxury menswear brand. I find with most men's collections I see things here and there that I like but they don't equate to any brand or designer identity. You could show me a Gucci jacket and one by Hermes and I would fail to see any distinction. But with Givenchy there's the digital prints, the star motif traced from shoulder to shoulder, or the loose sportswear shapes. It may not be the most innovative or the most radical clothing but the collections are selling out and I think it's thanks to the casual, sports elements he adds. If Tisci has found a winning formula-and he clearly has-why are so many other designers heralding the return of the suit?
Givenchy Spring Summer 2012 Review
Givenchy Spring Summer 2011
| Layers, layers, layers. I love it |
| This is a nice continuation from the last couture collection |
| Hey daddy bear |
I don’t feel this was his best work but it was still a beautifully gothic spring collection.
I think the collection could’ve done without the gay bondage touches, the press studs and the sports mesh. It looked outdated and felt more like a reflection of his taste in men rather than fashion.
The zippers were a nice touch and a continuation of what was shown for the couture show but it became tedious after the first ten looks and I also promised myself to put any designer on my strike list who did exposed zippers for Spring. I love how he used the zips to reposition the waist, dropping it ever so slightly making a languid silhouette.
The layering was also beautifully done, particularly on the opening look.
Catholic-free Givenchy



Givenchy didn’t capture my imagination this season. Like his last couture collection it lacked polish and it felt very cookie cutter Tisci. All the ingredients were there: lace, single blocks of colour for an entire outfit, loads of black and leather. But there were a few nice touches like the opening coat in a boney beige tone. There were also some beautiful tuxedo jackets and there’s been quite a few this season, United Bamboo comes to mind. I did find the layering theme interesting. If you view some of the looks you’ll see what I mean. And how weird is it that Tisci and Ghesquiere did a remarkably similar pant. They both did a high waisted version with a zip that was half undone to create these curling flaps. I didn’t find it particularly inventive but it was a nice touch and in Tisci’s case added to the layering theme he had.
I’d like to see Tisci try and move away from his usual schtick, perhaps do a tracksuit or something remotely humorous. He’s taken some steps, like removing any traces of Catholocism but it’s like come one, push yourself further, stop being so comfortable.
Givenchy Haute Couture Spring/Summer 2010 Review
Initially it mostly failed to muster any drama, a key element to Tisci's work. Something was missing. If you look at his 2010 pre-fall collection it's a shining example of what he does best; sharp brooding meets soft romanticism. It's in all his work and many of his trademarks were in this collection: the graphic lacework, the military coat, the organic coral-like embellishment and the nude tones. What he failed to do was whip it into shape and really make the whole collection sing.
What I'd missed the first time round was Tisci delving into the archives and looking back at the 70's. He admitted it was something he'd always been too afraid to do. It seems rather stupid that I'd missed the references to the 70's and Saint Laurent but Tisci's never done this before.
Some of the looks were too busy and the clothes were jostling for attention weighed down with extravagant beads and pailettes then topped off with wide lace hats.

I've studied look two repeatedly as if maybe I'd missed something but I cannot make sense of it. A black satin corset skirt with puckering seams, a cut-out bra which appeared to be clamping the model's breasts making them look short and saggy, a tulle net top and a grim looking hat. Maybe it was shot from a bad angle? Maybe it was just fucking ugly.
Lara Stone looked soigne in a fluffy pink bowed top with cuffed shorts and thigh-hugging suede boots. Other standouts included a gorgeous top with ruffles peeling away from the decolletage. The ruffles also appeared in a black feather-trimmed dress arching out from the elbows displaying Tisci's knack for silhouette.



GIVENCHY SPRING 2010
Crunchy pleats and decadent ruffles worked their magic over baby-doll dresses while a tribal-like print appeared on tops, leggings, shoes, everything. Saying it was tribal is a fairly blunt description, just because it’s black and white and zig-zagged it’s suddenly tribal. It’s closest relative would be the keffiyeh, a Tisci favourite that’s appeared in his couture and menswear collections.
After cleansing the palette Tisci did some beautiful, organic waistcoats that looked like ocean rocks covered in limpets followed by a series of loopy, draped dresses in dove grey and pale yellow. A leather wrapped open-toe platform was too reminiscent of an Alexander Wang shoe and an extremely unflattering jodhpur/babydoll combo made even the models look pregnant. As beautiful as the collection was, it’d be nice to see Tisci push himself a little more.













